NEWS UPDATE

A few from the last week or so

BBC - What jobs are male and what are female (Mark Easton): An old one from last year that I had not seen before.

Fighting Feminism - An attack by the V Spot (Mike Buchanan)

Daily Mail - Bring on quotas for women says TUC chief (Anna Edwards)

Daily Herald - Scotland lacking in male primary school teachers (Andrew Denholm)

Evening Standard - Soho restuarant continues trend in women-only bars (Emer Martin). Unless this is a private members club then KC’z Bar general manager and entrepreneur, KC Gates, will be breach of equality laws. See pubs and clubs section here.

Daily Telegraph - Government failing female entrepresneurs (Emma Barnett): More pleas for special treatment and discrimination against men. This time from Labour MP Seema Malhotra.

Amazon - Review on The Highway Rat (Tony Iqeq)

A Voice for Men - Interview with Erin Pizzey  

Daily Mail  - Diane Abbott MP says feminism destroyed the family (Tim Shipman)

The Observer - UK's top firms more male-dominated than FTSE rivals, new data reveals (Simon Goodley)

Daily Mail - Bias in the justice system (Peter Lloyd)

Daily Mail - John Leslie says false allegations destroyed my life

Posted by Skimmington

Comments

[Dave]

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/the-inbetweeners-has-anyone-seen-my-left-testicle-yeah-only-15-times-2083108.html

Every time I turn on the TV I'm appalled at the double standards. Unfortunately I stumbled across this one last night and was speechless. No wonder society has no respect for men and boys when they are continually ripped of their dignity. Can you imagine the directors (or ofcom) allowing a school girl in the inbetweeners to do a close up graphically intimate scene of her labia hanging out of her underwear!!

I'm really not sure who is to blame here but ultimately I guess it's the audience of males who don't stand up for themselves and complain. If it were the other way around there would be outrage. No wonder men are given no respect and I don't know how we can dig ourselves out of these humiliation tactics which are rife these days because men themselves seem to think it's acceptable. It's not.

[Dave]

Women's Hour is a MUST listen to today. They talk about child sexual abuse and recognise the statistical evidence that 17% of perpertrators are female, 60% of which are mothers. They also recognise the part the media plays in all of this whereby they tend to concentrate more on stranger abuse rather than family abuse, particularly female. My guess (and I'm not wrong) is that you can safely double or even treble these figures before arriving at the truth.

Please make sure you listen because this is yet another step forward for the BBC and I'm over the moon that Woman's Hour has acknowledged the fact that the media, what with it's almighty influencing power, can be very damaging and manipulative to society and men in particular. The person being interviewed mentioned this aspect and it's something I know I keep harping on about but I'm determined that people understand just how much power the media has over our young generation and how much damage they can do to our society.

The media has pandered to the feminist movement by totally ignoring men's issues and sweeping them under the carpet. Whilst at the same time they ram it down everyone's throats about women's rights.

The media HAS to stop this endless onslaught and the only way is for as many people (men or women) to complain at every opportunity where they see disrespect, unfair treatment, double-standards, besmirching of men, incorrect or skewed statistics, absence of information, one-sided biased views, feministic over representation, outright hateful misandry, degrading material, sexist behaviour, pathetic white-knight and mangina behaviour, female on male violence (and even male on male violence).

I want 2013 to be the year where the media gets a piece of our minds and where men stand united and tackle this monumental media monstrosity. I want this to be the year where it becomes politically incorrect to mock men at their expense and I want these feminist hypocrites operating within the media today (men and women you know who you are!) to crawl back under their stones whilst the rest of us find the courage to speak out at last, and not be scared to do so for fear of the shaming tactics.

I'm convinced that this site is being read by some substantially importand figures so I make no apoligies for my rantngs!

[Groan]

Also I believe in carrots. A well done for honest work such as that by Mark Easton. And for Peter Lloyd. They are swimming against the tide of their industries and deserve a well done.

[MrShadowfax42]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=nU27lSsp4jM

Please watch and rate, and/or flag with youtube as hate speech, as you feel appropriate.

[brian]

Women's Hour is a MUST listen to today. They talk about child sexual abuse and recognise the statistical evidence that 17% of perpetrators are female, 60% of which are mothers.

Now add to that emotional abuse like parental alienation and all will find women are the biggest abusers of children by far!!

[Dave]

You could be right, Brian, but there are many, many obsticles to overcome before society recognises that women/mothers can be extremely harmful to children as well as men/fathers. Getting people to speak out about these issues in the first place is going to require an advertising campaign. Who will want to pay for that? The Government certainly won't.

[brian]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2260411/One-women-victim-sex-crime-age-16-shocking-figures-reveal.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490

I've heard it all now. This is the kind of toxic drivel and outright lies in the media we must attack . I see they have changed it to 1 in 5 now but upped the lies and exaggeration elsewhere. One had only yo look at the first few lines to see the hidden truth.

"More than 1,000 women suffer sex attack EVERY DAY, report says"

Sub heading: Most of 400,000 female victims subject to unwanted touching or exposure

So it has started with, "ALL WOMEN ARE BEING RAPED AND BRUTALLY MURDERED OH MY GOD" - type hyperbole headline, then revealing the fact that most of them are simply claiming they was "touched" or "saw something". Given the state of western women today, we all know what that means these days, nothing.

They of course don't take into account the massive amount of false allegations that always go unpunished also.

Honestly this kind of drivel is sickening. It makes me wonder why Mike is even going near that Daily Mail, I think it is more harmful than anything to be seen in it politically.

[brian]

It is also sickening to read the comments on this article above. No wonder I hate the British public and think they are the dumbest easily led retards outside of North Korea*

* = Generalisation, subject to independent survey, may not apply to a gifted few.

[brian]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/saudiarabia/9795758/Saudi-King-Abdullah-appoints-women-to-Shura-Council.html

The stupidity spreads. So even he appoints them because they are WOMEN. Does it matter whether they was better than any man for the job?

[brian]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9795632/Rapists-have-average-of-four-convictions-each.html

More lies and sick manipulated feminist agenda reports in the Telegraph. I find these lying articles very dangerous to society.

[Brian]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9795632/Rapists-have-average-of-four-convictions-each.html

MGTOW has just been blocked from commenting on the Telegraph for posting some links countering this story that provide statistics, forums of false rape victims mothers discussing it and other such comments slapping down this article.

Free press? More like Nazi run.

[brian]

The Telegraph has now closed and blocked ALL comment son this article @ 15:58

[brian]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZRforhAoA3Y

Red pills and reporting to youtbe please....

[brian]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/9797904/Mother-of-Indias-Daughter-calls-for-rape-gang-to-be-hanged.html

Again MGTOW speaks the balance. wonder how many of these vile comments by knee-jerk idiots in the west would so quickly aimed at the women who condemned those falsely accused?

Can you not see the incredible mental illness of normalcy in a supposed civilised western country?

I think Mike Buchanan is in la-la land if he thinks a political party will get anywhere against this knee jerk brainwashing we see in these comments.. I mean that respectfully.

[Brian]

While we all recognise the incident in India as an horrific and inexcusable crime, India has probably the worst record of false rape claims by women in the World. Why does nobody scream about all of those, many of them have caused the deaths of men! It also has one of the most barbaric and irrational populations of White-knightism.

[Mike Buchanan]

Brian, I thought I'd made my view clear on a number of occasions. Feminism can't be defeated as an ideology, the most we can hope to do is to thwart its manifestations on an issue-by-issue basis. That's what our party is going to strive to do. We will engage in a series of practical fights, prioritised in the light of a number of factors. That doesn't seem to us to be la-la land. We may yet be proved wrong. But I'm working full-time, seven days a week, at my own cost, to make this vision a reality.

Mike Buchanan
ANTI-FEMINISM LEAGUE
http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com

[brian]

Best of luck with it Mike I appreciate that but I honestly think due to the saturation of British social sengineering on the public, it is beyond hope of even that. Case by case basis is like pouring a cup of water on an oil rig fire, it will never reach a final solution or cure. You only have to see the rabid levels of anti-male/white-knight brainwashing in those comments on those stories to see it.

Maybe it is time to stop wasting time with western males who are simply white-knighted away and turn too support Sharia law and the like?

Them guys still have their nuts at least?

[Mike Buchanan]

Thanks Brian, but Sharia Law would mean I'd have to give up my real ale, and that seems a very heavy price to pay!

[brian]

Lol, but seriously, this is what I meant about the other elements of MRA who have had enough and believe a more "extreme" approach is needed. What will your party do to include them and not alienate them more?

[brian]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/greenpolitics/legal/9798650/Husband-tricked-into-believing-wifes-children-were-his-awarded-25000-damages.html

On another serious note

Well it is about time this female CRIME was recognised, but 25k for all those years is horse shit! A woman gets her butt pinched at work and gets 250k ! More nonsense from our courts and discrimination against men

This i.m.o is as serious as rape is too a woman and the punishment and awards should damn well reflect it !!

[Mike Buchanan]

Brian, you will find the party very inclusive but I'd rather not say any more at this stage - keeping the powder dry, and all that.

Paternity fraud is surprisingly common, and is on our 'radar'.

[Brian]

Mid-feb you "go live" if I recall, I presume this is still on course? I will look forward it.

[Mike Buchanan]

It may be a bit later, but not much. We plan to have an official launch / press conference in early March.

[Groan]

This Paternity Fraud case judgement is unusual. Had the couple not be divorced the outcome is likely to have been different. In effect usually courts take the view that a husband is de-facto father even if genetics prove otherwise. This is usually the view as it is seen as being in the children's interest mainly in terms of financial support. I expect the costs and compensation related only to the post divorce settlement. I expect this is fertile ground for the Party as the law in application often is manifestly unfair as courts want to avoid a cost to the public purse by creating more benefit dependent lone mothers.

[Mike Buchanan]

Groan, we share your analysis with respect to 'the law in application'. We think our proposals in this area will raise a few eyebrows. But can it be right that the law encourages women to have children by Mr A, Mr B, and Mr C, and requires her long-term partner - Mr D - to financially provide for them (and for her, for that matter)? I look forward to the feminists defending that!