Academic and best-selling author Camille Paglia reveals why women in America should not vote for Hillary Clinton.
This article (and please read the debate underneath it) appeared in The Daily Telegraph (link).
Her final paragraphs reveal why a Clinton Presidency would have every man cowering under the table:-
"...by attaching herself so blatantly to anti-male rhetoric - particularly in view of her debt to her husband - she is espousing a retrograde brand of feminism no longer applicable to the US."
"If Hillary loses, batten the hatches against a mass resurrection of paranoid, paleo-feminist martyrs, counting their wounds and wailing at the blood-red moon."
Why was there no newspaper article written on this when the UK version of Hillary, Harriet Harman, was trying (and successfully) to be Deputy Leader of the Labour Party?