The Rights Of Man

EVEN LOTTERY FUNDING IS BIASED AGAINST MEN

Looking through a Lottery application form (link) for funding, this gem of male bias was found:-

Notice any group missing yet?

Yep that's right - there is a tick box for women and girls but nothing for men and boys.

In this Government's pro-women, anti-male, target driven culture, even lottery funding gets a politically correct makeover.

It means there is an inherently biased funding criteria at play because if there was not, either there would not be a box just for women and girls, or, there would also be a box for men and boys as well.

SUNDERLAND OPENS COURT FOR WIFE-BEATERS BUT NO MENTION OF HUSBAND BEATERS

The Sunderland Echo let the cat out of the bag when it announced that Sunderland's new domestic violence court was for wife-beaters (link).

As the article states "Det Insp Foggin believes the introduction of a specialist court in Sunderland would help to boost the number of convictions secured against wife beaters, as well as act as a deterrent."

Obviously any male victims in Sunderland will not be treated symphatically if that is the attitude of their local police force.

Maybe Inspector Foggin should look at the Home Office Research that shows 1 in 4 DV incidents are against men and that men make up 1 in every 3 victims.

DMAX SURVEY SHOWS THAT MEN HAVE TO LIVE BY FEMINIST RULES

According to a survey by new TV channel DMAX, 52% of men believe they have to live by women's rules and according to the report in the Daily Telegraph (link) today:-

Men say they "feel handcuffed" by political correctness - only 33 per cent feel they can speak freely and say what they think, whereas two thirds find it safer and easier to keep their opinions to themselves.

The survey also found that 82% of men felt they have lost their traditional male role in society, with 84% of women in agreement. More than half of all men said they felt undervalued,

With 52% feeling they have to live by women's rules yet only 10% of men and 14% of women agreed that women do not respect men today, there seems to be a clear dichotomy.

What the dichotomy shows is that that men feel they are second best but that is not at the hands of normal women.

They feel that they are handcuffed by political correctness and have to follow women's rules because they are at the mercy of the constant anti-male battering perpetrated by the political class (government, local authorities, media, political parties and anti-male pressure groups like the Fawcett Society and the Commission for Equality and Human Rights - formerly the Equal Opportunities Commission).

This battering of masculinity and male-ness is exactly what the political class of feminist fundamentalists want and as the research shows, they are winning.

That is why the men's rights movement is vital.

The story is also covered:- (link) and  (link- 3rd story down).

FURTHER MISTREATMENT METED OUT TO WARREN BLACKWELL

As reported in the Daily Mail (link), Warren Blackwell has lost his appeal against having to pay his bed and board for the time he wrongly spent at Her Majesty's Pleasure after being falsely accused of committing rape by a serial accuser.  As he states, whilst he received more than enough compensation to cover the £12,000 cost, it is the principle that matters.

This judgement really does stink and it is another case of institutional sexism against men. How can it be just and fair that an innocent man is charged for the time he wrongfully spent in prison because of false allegations made against him which severely damaged his and his family's reputation. It is even worse that those actually guilty of crimes like robbery and murder are not charged for their bed and board.

No wonder people in the UK have lost faith in their institutions. 

EVEN THE 2008 NEW YEAR'S HONOURS LIST IS POLITICALLY CORRECT

Looking through the New Year's Honours List web-site (link), it was bemusing to see that when the Cabinet Office listed the percentages of people who received Honours, they published this fact:-

There are 378 successful women candidates in the list, including 6 Dames, 32 Cubes and 4 CBS. This represents 39% of the total, the same as the last List but still higher than the historic norm.

It is surely irrelevant, in this allegedly world of equal opportunities, what the gender breakdown of those Honoured are. It should go to those who deserve an Honour and that should be all that counts.

As the Government is monitoring and publishing a gender breakdown, it means they are likely to have targets and these targets would be based on increasing the number of women who receive Honours. If the Government felt gender was irrelevant, they would not be monitoring it.

In the PC world that this Government inhabits, which is resolutely anti-equality, it is likely that some women may have been given an Honour whilst some men who were more deserving did not. This would have been done to boost the numbers of women receiving an Honour. It is a cynical point of view but the Government's record suggest it is a realistic one.