Often, the elites (the state, pressure groups and the media - especially the BBC) act with incredulity when anyone claims that there are strains of feminism (link) that are really about men-hating and demanding more rights for women than men. Anyone making this argument is normally shouted down under a barrage of abuse and warped statistics, it's like being in a 1980's student union meeting.
Well the cat is well and truly out of the bag now.
Oprah Winfrey, the US TV presenter, has been bombarded with messages by US men-haters solely because she believes Barack Obama would be a better President than Hilary Clinton. Such is the spite that she has been classed a traitor.
To quote the story in The Times (link) "It started with a message on her website entitled “Oprah is a traitor” and rapidly expanded to include several discussions that attracted hundreds of comments.
In the original post, a reader called austaz68 said she “cannot believe that women all over this country are not up in arms over Oprah’s backing of Obama. For the first time in history we actually have a shot at putting a woman in the White House and Oprah backs the black MAN. She’s choosing her race over her gender.” An interesting on-line debate also ensued in The Times.
Now if feminist fundamentalists truly believed in equality and meritocracy, then the gender and race of the next President would be irrelevant, it is the best person for the job.I am sure Oprah is backing Obama because she feels he is the best person.
The feminist fundamentalists just want a woman, full stop. No matter whether she is the best or not. They want special treatment and special favours and play the gender card at every turn. They and their ilk have been exposed, they are men-haters.
Will it cross the Atlantic? Well in many respects it already has, but not to this level. As covered on this site previously (link), The Fawcett Society, The Commission of Equality and Human Rights and the two main political parties believe in promoting women over men in politics solely on the basis of gender, not their ability.
Labour has lied on many occasions, but as they are aware of the current situation of the feminist agender, they go along with what ever the feminist want.
Labour is not as popular as they they think, but what keeps them their, is votes, keep the feminists happy" and they will vote for them, no matter what the current situation is like.
I live in a FEMINAZI dictatorship, in Hereford where men have given in to the FEMINAZIS, they are even helping the feminists.
I have come to the opinion who ever becomes our next leader in the UK, that things will get even worse for Mankind.When will Mankind say enough is enough, what will happen?
We can't even see our kids after seperation, but we still have to pay maintenance for our kids we don't see, how much have we got to tollerate!!
Posted by: Pete | Saturday, 26 January 2008 at 10:50
I have heard a lot of sexist comments in the past 20 to 30 years and they have all been by women and downgrading men. Have you not heard it said "What can you expect from a man?" Sexisn pure and simple.
Antimale sexism so commone that it is not noticed and it is these same women who claim that it is men who are prejudiced about them.
To put this in perspective I do not hate women or think that all women are prejudiced in this way - but a lot of them are in my experience, and society teaches and encourages them to be that way.
I have been married twice and have found, in my case, that I can spend most of my life seeking to make them happy, and to do things for them and they always ended up criticsing me for something - I didn't use the right words, they didn't like my tone of voice, I was 'thinking" something bad. Honestly they even thought they could read my mind - and they were so wrong.
I have tried to choose wisely but I think I will just give up.
Posted by: bill | Saturday, 14 June 2008 at 17:29