NEWS UPDATE

A few from this week including those on fatherhood and the riots.

The False Rape Society - The prosecution of false rape accusers "must be stopped," says Lisa Longstaff (Pierce Harlan): A superb dissection of Lisa Longstaff from UK against rape who cannot deal with the fact that some women who falsely accuse men are letting down women who are raped. The anti-male feminists cannot bear to think of blaming other women.

Daily Telegraph - Absent fathers have a lot to answer for(Christine Odone): Pure misandry from Odone, certainly worth reading the comments in the debate section.

Male Health - Men who circumcise are breaking the law

Daily Mail  - Britian's liberal intelligentsia have broken every social virtue (Melanie Phillips)

Daily Mail - Divorcee wins £4.3m even though she did not work for it

OPen Markets - Gender quotas spread in European boards (Hans Bader)

Guardian - Feminist summer school (Lizzy Davies): Training for a new generation of men-haters

Guido Fawkes - Harman is Gangsta Mutha #1

Posted by Skimmington

Comments

[John Kimble]

Odone writes some good stuff so somewhat disappointing at first glance.

However if you read the article there isn't actually a single word of misandry in there it's only the actual headline which is offensive.

Sometimes writers simply produce a piece and the editors who create the headlines, so it may well be someone else that is to blame here.

[Bob]

Yes I agree John, I've noticed that too. Often the only thing that matters is the headline.

Misandrists know that most people just skim over the headlines rather than take the time to read the whole article so they encapsulate the propaganda message in the headline alone.

The Yesterday Channel (aka UKTV History and a BBC owned station) often uses this tactic, as do the MSN and Yahoo News sections and I use the word 'news' very losely.

I like this excellent example, from a positive point of view, by the great Esther Vilar.

The headings truely encapsulate the truths feminists have been trying to hide for decades.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esther_Vilar

[Bob]

Here is The Manipulated Man be Esther Vilar in its entirity, it is essential reading.

www.naturalthinker.net/trl/texts/Vilar,Esther/ManipulatedMan.html

[Skimmington]

Eeeek, better retract by comments on Christine!

[Bob]

The difference is that Christine doesn't back up her headlines in the article but Esther Vilar does. No retraction needed.