Whenever the feminist fundamentalists lay their charge that men are the beneficiaries of everything and that women are subjected to a daily torrent of misogyny, sometimes you think 'why do they hate men so much'
Some evidence is here in an article from Cath Elliot in the Guardian (link) where she rants that men must take the medicine (over the anti-male Equalities Bill) that she and other females have had to swallow, all because she got allegedly stitched up in for a job in the monolithic Post Office in 1985!
She says "Well I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, but quite frankly I really couldn't care less if privileged white men are about to get a taste of their own medicine; but they're not anyway, so I don't understand what all the fuss is about." and she has sons!
Just because she was an alleged victim of sexist behaviour 23 years ago, all men, even those not even born then, must suffer. This is why the burgeoning men’s movement in the UK is needed because this sort of sexist behaviour needs to be challenged.
Indeed it was in fact on the Conservative Home web-site (link) .
Nice to have you back - I thought that maybe Harman had sent someone round to sort you out or something.
Posted by: John Kimble | Wednesday, 02 July 2008 at 23:53
There is a word for this woman's stereotyping all men based on her alleged experience: prejudice. When applied to ANY class aside from white males, it is considered wrongful and immoral. She is truly a misandrist in every sense of the word because she is fine with punishing an entire class based on gender and the perceived injustices perpetrated on her by some members of that class in the past. We must stand up to bigots like this, and let the world know that we are out to insure thay have no voice in any civil debate.
Posted by: FalseRapeAcrhivist | Friday, 04 July 2008 at 17:09