ONLY ANTI-MALE FEMINISTS CAN OPPOSE MALE GROUPS AND SOCIETIES AT UNIVERSITY

The biggest and widest breeding ground for the anti-male feminism that drives UK public policy is our universities. They always have been the intellectual heartbeat of the country and many who are indoctrinated at university go on to dominate both politics and the civil service/public sector. Often there is an incubation period, where they join the public sector and then have to wait to rise to gain power.

Over the past 30 years or so, the plethora of women's officers, women's societies and other such organisations have been the norm at every student union. This means that even where there is a university that does have a gender studies department there is a ready and able place to stir up anti-male feeling on every campus.

The reason for raising this is the recent debate has been the small growth of men's societies on some campuses. The papers covered this week that both Oxford and Manchester universities have inaugurated such societies though others have or have had them. Ben Wild who set up MENS in Manchester has an excellent article in the Guardian (comments worth reading as well). These are a welcome antidote especially as many members are actually women, you know, the one that actually like men, appreciate their role in society and their life, those who may have brothers and certainly have fathers and certainly do not agree with the nonsense spouted by the anti-male feminists. 

There are others mens groups on campus. Kent University has one or certainly had one - an attempt to abolish was made here - see page 9) as does Hull University, Lampeter, De Montford, Southampton and I think the University of London.

Of course, this is all good news and if there is to be equality then if there is a women's officer then there should be a men's officer.

What has been astounding, but of course, not at all surprising has been the usual backlash. The National Union of Students (a body meant to represent all students including men) does not have a men's officer and Olivia Bailey, NUS national women's officer, said in the Guardian: "Discrimination against men on the basis of gender is so unusual as to be non-existent, so what exactly will a men's society do? To suggest that men need a specific space to be 'men' is ludicrous, when everywhere you turn you will find male-dominated spaces," she added. What planet??

Rumour has it that the Fawcett Society and the Equalities and Human Rights Commission are involved in a recruitment tug-of-war to employ her because she is so on-message for those two organisations.

What is so sickening is the fact that the NUS and Ms Olivia Bailey are so anti-male, they even publish a document called "I will win the arguments". The documents sets out the themes to be used to secure women's representatives on campus student unions and openly admits what should be said to stop men's representatives from being established. Just reading this scandalous document you can taste the anti-male vitriol.

It should be dismissed as the absurd but in today's anti-male Britain this document will be circulated to all student unions plus their women's officers so that everything can be done to stop men's officers and men's societies from being established.

This author and anyone who uses its argument does not believes in equality - they are anti-male feminists and they will be all working in senior positions in the public sector within a decade. Let no one be fooled.

Other good articles - one great from Jenni Murray (Daily Mail), one recent and one old

Comments

[John Kimble]

Excellent stuff. Info on those wanting to recruit that man hater was new to me.

(btw 3 typos in third to last paragraph and one in second to last)

[Groan]

Somehow Men should be made to read "I will read the arguements" just to feel the disdain the authors show. Even towards feminist men!! The sad bit is that it reads like something from the late 70s when I was at college. Many of those people are now in power hence the misanderist policies of our present rulers. Somehow I would have thought the new generations would have moved on from this.

[Groan]

For sad examples of precisely the lack of any respect for men see:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/29/barbara-ellen-madeleine-martin-commenhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/29/barbara-ellen-madeleine-martin-commentt

[John Kimble]

Correct link for the article Groan posted:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/29/barbara-ellen-madeleine-martin-comment

[John Kimble]

Stop spamming

[Jon]

Hi, 'buy viagra'. Listen, I just wanted to thank you for posting your spam, as without it I would never have read this very interesting and relevant (to me) article. Much appreciated, dude! Keep up the good work!

[steroids online]

Rumour has it that the Fawcett Society and the Equalities and Human Rights Commission are involved in a recruitment tug-of-war to employ her because she is so on-message for those two organisations.

[labour hire]

I am not aware of men being disrespected in UK. I didn't know that there are anti male feminists who do such thing. Very enlightening.

[burberry usa]

ui postozxjqf, Hey... -burberry usa omg thats so jay forego it's suitably stupid burberry usa, ktzuvjxfでク