A few recent ones and thank you to those who have sent them in.
The Guardian - The Second Sexism is just victim-envy (Suzanne Moore)
Daily Mail - Who cares if men are stuck in the glass cellar (Liz Jones)
Daily Telegraph - Number of men working part-time dopubles as they cannot find full-time work (TUC): Full TUC report. The TUC to me, is severely compromised and inconsistent in talking about this issue as it is constantly banging on about women's rights. Only the day before it issued this report, it said the Equalities Commission had to equality proof the government's policies on behalf of women - which what it really mean was women needed special treatment over men.
You Tube - James Williams' interview with Dr Peter Ball of Norm-UK
You Tube - VW pro-father ad
New Statesmen - The Men's Rights Zeitgeist (Rhiannon and Holly)
Men;s Network - National conference early bird tickets on sale
Daily Mail - Tasered twice and stabbed husband 17 times (Paul Bentley): What are the odds that if the genders were revered, the husband would go to prison?
The Observer - Cannes 2012, Why no female directors (Vanessa Thorpe): This is a classic case of victimhood without evidence. Where is the evidence that a film directed by a women should be in the top 22 list but is not because of discrimination. There is no evidence so to claim discrimination is just another request for special treatment and the end of equality.
Posted by Skimmington
You want a laugh?
Below is what I posted to the clearly misandrist and mentally deranged New Statesmen article, well I tried to but according to their site it contained profanity? I reposted it many times moving the words around somewhat confused what in it was supposed to be vile and offensive. I can only conclude the words Misandry and feminism were to blame. Then before I tried re-wording them and reposting it again,it classed me as spam and blocked me? They REALLY don't like the truth do they:-)
-------------------------------------
Well this article has made me smile, why? It has proved one big truth that the MRA know already. Men's rights is on the right track, reveals the truth and is hitting at the very core of misandry and feminism..and as you can see from this article, they know it and the spittle is frothing from every orifice in them! ;-)
Keep it up lads.
Posted by: ian | Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 08:57
The Cannes festival is something I have a fair bit of experience of in the past. In fact I noted while there over the years, many conversations in amongst the hub-bub of the crowds of left wingers trying to manipulate the film industry against the right, feminists against men etc. It is after all a hotbed of public perception manipulation.
I think the comments in the Guardian (especially by Anixia) speak volumes and give a nice indicator of the public's foot up the feminists sense of self entitlement.
Posted by: ian | Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 09:24
Another incident takes place even more sadistic that the Katherin kieu becker one. Thing is it is in Texas that still has the death penalty. If this was a man doing it to a woman we all know how it would be treated and it would not be like the vile cast of loose women treated it over the Becker incident. YES, yes she should face the death penalty if found guilty. Yet the early signs of difference in treatment for a woman is showing...she gets a bail bond available to her even after a crime of that vicious magnitude that ended in death and it is even $800,000 less than Beckers which did not?
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/335710/20120501/cristal-paulette-richardson-cuts-mans-penis.htm
Posted by: dave | Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 10:41
Cambridge Feminazi's again showing us that feminism has nothing to do with equality and anyone who thinks that is a fool. Did you hear them complaining about Men in the competition?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/9282860/Cambridge-students-in-Rear-of-the-Year-competition.html
Posted by: ian | Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 17:49
Not a problem!
Just call it "Bishop for life" and you can simply discriminate based on the fact a few supporters don't want them in. What's good for the goose eh?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9282853/Church-faces-crisis-over-tainted-women-bishops-plan.html
Posted by: dave | Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 21:57
HOLD ON A MINUTE!!
Woman makes up allegation of being sexually attacked on a train, takes some poor innocent blokes picture, has her identity anonymised, no picture of her, his picture is put in paper and released by police then later he is discounted for any wrong doing and his picture put in the paper again, while the CPS advises them to close the case.
So what punishment did she get? Where are the facts as to why it was closed? As far as I am concerned this man will still have mud stuck to his name because of is picture being released and no public disclosure of the woman's identity and the facts surrounding her "alleged" complaint.
Should they now not release her identity in case another man may come forward who may have been a victim of false allegation by her previously? WHy not eh?
Posted by: ian | Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 16:28
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2148637/Women-happier-better-educated-stressed-overworked-men-study-claims.html
This is a big study and again, with reference to Suzanne Moore above who exactly are the "victims". Time and again the facts speak for themselves, men are not some uniformly privileged class. In fact middle class women in the west are probably the most privileged "class" there has ever been in terms of longevity and ease of life(apart from aristocrats of either sex).
Posted by: Groan | Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 17:27
I cold be wrong but the hate filled diatribe spewing forth from the likes of Liz Jones and other misandrists suggests to me they are getting worried. You (we?) have them on the run so they are reacting in the only way they know and like the spoiled little brats they are.
I don't need a man to change a lightbulb, I can do it myself. I could even rewire the entire building if need be.
Posted by: Jenny | Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 00:32
Someone has been deleting comments again I see. I am starting to wonder who is really behind this blog and what their agenda really is. Makes you wonder why they hide their name. Is this a mild version of the Reddit scam to undermine MRA?
When you compare this blog or site to others, I have never seen such a lack of comment/debate and so much censorship when there is any real words spoken.
Posted by: ian | Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 00:33