Just a quick post but if anyone ever wanted an example of the institutional discrimination endemic at the laughably titled Equalities and Human Rights Commission this is it.
The report 'The impact on changes in commissioning and funding commissioning women-only services' is paid for by the taxpayer to Cambridge Policy Consultants.
Its interesting reading as it looks at whether changes in funding and commissioning had a disadvantageous effect on women-only services.
While at face value the main area of discrimination would be the fact that there is not an equivalent report for men. It's worse.
The report (page x or page 14 of 100 if you look at it this way) explains how awful it is that some women's groups have to either open their doors to men or had to share funding to help support men's services. The complaint is that the law provides for services to disadvantaged groups but this is on the basis of women being placed at a disadvantage not in the context that men are group who may also need support hence why women-only groups are being asked to support them too. That is not recognised - men are swept under the carpet.
Complete bias but what do you expect from the anti-male Equalities and Human Rights Commission.
Posted by Skimmington
PS Debate on closing the Equalities and Human Rights Commission
PS PS Only three of its 14 governors are male - that's equality for you
Thanks for this. I note that health Commissioners are the most insistent on equity and effectiveness. Too many women only services are ineffective and badly managed . Often spending public money on lobbying rather than actually delivering the services they are paid to deliver. Health commissioners tend to be less swayed by political considerations unlike councils which continue to fund in equitable and ineffective services for fear of the feminist DV lobby.
Posted by: Groan | Thursday, 01 November 2012 at 00:33
Nice to see the institutional discrimination in our media using deliberate censorship to force the acceptance of women's excuses for murder in PND. A female journalist wrote this article and then when manwomanmyth videos were presented and comment left that questioned it ...they was censored and deleted. (screen grabs made of the last one left)
When reposted and asked why these comments are being censored with discrimination, they was all deleted, other peoples too and user accounts blocked. At the exact same time the likes increased on the posts that supported these excuses for women and the only comments remain are positive towards it.
This is what kind of femi-fascist filth the Telegraph have working for them.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/9645889/Will-I-slide-back-into-that-dark-tunnel-of-depression.html
Posted by: Ian | Thursday, 01 November 2012 at 09:11
well that was fun on above comment link, battled with them all day long and the constant discriminating censorship by the telegraph, virtually alone, apart form a couple of good men. Where was you lot? :-)
Posted by: ian | Thursday, 01 November 2012 at 22:10
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227124/Newsnight-bunnygirl-BBC-news-snubs-male-economist-54-picks-fashion-blogger-25-debate-tax.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
Yet more putting dumb women in jobs of men simply because they are women, no wonder everything today is crap.
Posted by: stuart | Saturday, 03 November 2012 at 12:23
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227570/Met-Police-sued-plan-jobs-black-people-women.html
This is one to watch. Already women benefit from positive action. additional courses mentoring access to imformation and advice. In most public bodies evidence is that this has led to women achieving management positions quicker in their career. Application of this law will accelerate this Existing discrimination against men. Men really do need to be more informed on the Equality act as it needs challenging in courts. Clearly the EHRC will not be doing so.
Posted by: Groan | Sunday, 04 November 2012 at 10:07
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZLyPQ_4ET24
Hurricane Sandy really helps to show the true value of women, those who THINK they are equal, those who THINK they deserve all the same rewards and respects of those who REALLY do everything we need in this world.
This guy sums it up.
IMHO This is why we need a down tools movement, can you imagine what these "empowered" twots would do if all those in this video said, "F*ck you do it yourself"
Posted by: stuart | Sunday, 04 November 2012 at 15:17
Stuart, the bimbo still was a better choice than Richard Murphy, and amused a lot of people greatly.
RM's nemesis is a guy called Tim Worstall, check out his blog (timworstall.com), the category 'ragging on Ritchie' can be found here: http://timworstall.com/category/ragging-on-ritchie/ enjoy the gems!
Posted by: Carina | Sunday, 04 November 2012 at 22:16
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2228536/Jobless-mother-38-living-benefits-10-luxury-holidays-4-years-fleet-cars.html
Yet another pussy pass.
Posted by: stuart | Tuesday, 06 November 2012 at 11:50
YET ANOTHER PUSSY PASS!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2228676/Woman-subject-hospital-order-suffocating-daughter-love.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
HOW MANY MORE FU****G WOMEN WILL ESCAPE PRISON WHERE MEN ARE ALWAYS IMPRISONED?
Posted by: Stuart | Tuesday, 06 November 2012 at 18:41
I don't understand why always everyone gets against women? Men and women both must be treated equally!
Posted by: criticism of socialist feminism | Wednesday, 07 November 2012 at 09:47