Most of my posts this year have concerned the O2 and Symantec censorship scandal, some readers may becoming bored of the issue by now but I make no apologies for them in fact they'll keep coming until the censorship stops. To be honest, I've probably been rather two soft on these companies in the past and things are going to step up a gear from now onwards.
I keep learning more about the Rulespace filter by the day and I made a quite astonishing discovery recently. O2 and Symantec have two possible ways of blocking a site, it can either be classed as a "hate site" or be placed in the "hate" category, either way it gets censored and access is restricted.
Take a racist site such as Stormfront, O2's url checker shows us that it is in the "hate" category. The same goes for a site such as the National Coalition for Men, one of the oldest men's organisations in existence. However, in addition to it's place in the "hate" category, it also receives a "hate site" classification, something not found for Stormfront.org. So Stormfront is blocked once, yet a perfectly legitimate organisation such as NCFM.org is blocked twice over just for good measure, just to make sure it never gets seen.
A quick glance at Stormfront's forums soon reveals racistand derogatroy comments about Africans and Jews, whereas the top article on NCFM.org concerned the need to defend the concept of innocent until proven guilty. Despite this, O2 and Symantec are clearly saying a respected non profit organisation advocating for men's human rights and gender equality is worse than Stormfront, and more deserving of censorship and a "hate" classification. The Rulespace filter system is so misandrist or so flawed that it favours proud racists over men's human rights advocates.
The list of sites deemed worse than Stormfront by these companies even includes dvmen.org, a site for male victims of domesitc violence in Colerado run by the Equal Justice Foundation. Also apparantly worse than Stormfront is mensdefence.org, the site of author and pioneering men's equality advocate Richard F Doyle.
Please remember to cancel your O2 contract if you haven't done so already and uninstall your Symantec software, in both cases there are quite a few cheaper and better alternatives out there anyway. Also don' forget to give the reason for your cancellation.
by John Kimble
The effect of their misandry IS biting them. Only recently, Symantec were removed from a short-list of potential vendors for a company I was advising. The company wasn't directly concerned with men's issues being censored but someone mentioned "if they can get this area so wrong, what else are they messing up?" and so Symantec were crossed off the list.
Eventually, if nothing else convinces Symantec, falling profits will make them behave decently.
Posted by: Douglas | Wednesday, 19 June 2013 at 09:24
Yes it's true, the only way these companies will sit up and take notice is if people cancel their service, citing their policies as the reason.
Posted by: JH | Wednesday, 19 June 2013 at 15:12
"It is no use appealing to their sense of justice. They will only respond if they see a threat to their power."
George Orwell
Posted by: AH | Wednesday, 19 June 2013 at 22:14
Not bored at all with your report, John, please keep up the good work and keep us informed. For God's sake, Mike B, mention this one in your next interview please :-)
I agree that a loss in profit would quickly alter their path. And this philosophy extends to the rest of men's issues. I'm a firm believer in the idea that the mechanics of society operates based on levels of acceptability. In other words, if people don't complain then there is no reason to put a stop to anything. The only way that men's issues will get resolved is if people keep complaining. I implore all readers interested in men's rights to keep complaining to newspapers, TV, radio etc. about male discrimination and double-standards until they are flooded with complaints and awareness is raised in full. I also think it's a good idea to boycott obvious offenders and put your money elsewhere!
Posted by: Dave | Wednesday, 19 June 2013 at 23:27