Yesterday we ran a story about the problems some students had at the University of East Anglia because they fully understood what equality means but the vested interests of the Feminist Fundamentalist movement did not.
The story reminded me of a previous story about Olivia Bailey the then National Union of Student's Women's Officer who had produced a document called "I will win the arguments" which had a section specifically designed to not just to stop anymore men's officers from being appointed on campuses but also to abolish those few in place. This document has moved from its last address and is now here (page 7).
However, digging around, I found a resolution that was passed at the 2010 National Union of Student's Women's National Campaign Conference. It is in the minutes of this year's conference that occurred at the weekend (there was no similar motion in 2011). The motion is on page 15 and is available via this pdf Download Motion no 803_Men's Officer.
The motion was crystal clear - it wants all existing men's officers to be scrapped, men's officers reinforce the advantages they have on campus (there are now of course less men than women on campuses because of Britain's failure to educate boys so who knows what fantasy advantages these are) and that men's liberation groups be banned but women's liberation groups be kept.
The hatred of men comes through loud and clear and the concern is, and as reviewed yesterday, that those who passed this motion and spoke up for it will soon be embedded into the political framework of this country at a national, local, pressure group (taxpayer funded of course) or quango level. Those feminist fundamentalists will take their student views and infest them into the body politic as they have done since the 1970's.
The power of the internet has meant here it has been exposed for the world to see. In times of yore, these motions would have been passed and no one outside those who went to the conference would know it.
The war against men is being started on campuses up and down the UK and the radicalisation of some women turns them into fundamentalists who despise and hate men and believe men are not equals,they are subservient.
Posted by Skimmington
You do well to expose this. It is an old tactic called "no platform". The intemperate tone and jargon illustrates the point you make perfectly.
Posted by: Groan | Wednesday, 16 March 2011 at 23:30
Yet another exclusive on this blog, really good stuff.
To be fair the feminists do have a point here in a small way. There shouldn't be a men's officer just as there shouldn't be a women's officer. There should simply be one person responsible for gender equality representing all groups. A men's officer only becomes necessary when no one else bothers to represent men (or when they begin campaigning against men)
Have to say I found the following line from the motion opposing men's officers to be most interesting:
"They often promote activities that are detrimental to the women's cause, whilst claiming to offer help/support to men"
I wonder what other types of officers that type of argument might apply to? Perhaps there is even one particular type of officer on campus so full of hatred and dishonesty that they even actively oppose the possibility representation for the opposite sex?
Posted by: John Kimble | Thursday, 17 March 2011 at 01:45
It really troubles me that this hateful motion passed. Lets read some more:
"We must fight against the existence of men’s officers"
Almost sounds like a threat, as if they are some sort of inferior beings in need of extermination. Note how they're not fighting against their arguments or points but against their very existence.
"As men’s officers have no real campaigning role, that makes their role simply symbolic"
I think the gentleman who was the subject of yesterday's post mostly debunked this bs.
Posted by: John Kimble | Thursday, 17 March 2011 at 01:52
I agree John with the point that we should have Gender Equality Officers not an officer for each gender but we all know getting rid of women's officers is nigh on impossible. Unfortunately.
Posted by: Skimmington | Thursday, 17 March 2011 at 22:45
Could you make the URL's for your pages smaller it is awful trying to link this on YouTube, Reddit etc.
This is the link for this page.
http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2011/03/yesterday-we-ran-a-story-about-the-problems-some-students-had-at-the-univeristy-of-erast-anglia-becuas-ethey-fully-understood.html
Posted by: ZimbaZumba | Thursday, 10 May 2012 at 14:02