As we know the government's equalities department proudly boasts about the fact that it is institutionally sexist against men by even admitting on its website that equality doesn't include men:
"We lead on issues relating to women, sexual orientation and transgender equality matters."
It isn't just the fact that they refuse to deal with inequalities against men, they do not even believe men exist.
It has also boasted that it wants to strengthen women's voices and not even feel men have a voice, a theme the site has raised before and also here. It's equality strategy (page 23) also says it wants to speak to women's groups but no mention of male groups which is why the Men's Network letter is so important.
Amidst all of the the focus on Norgrove, the government's equalities department slipped out its response to the consultation on "strengthening women's voices in government".
What is always the most enlightening about these documents is not the government's response but the special treatment pleas from women's groups. Not only do they want to protect the special treatment and positive discrimination they receive they want more - all to ensure they keep men and male issues of inequality out of the picture. The aim is to dominate the whole sphere and stop men's group's from even having the crumbs off the table let alone a place at it.
The most telling paragraph for me is number 31:
A number of organisations supported the proposal from the National Association ofWomen’s Organisations and the Women’s Resource Centre that they be funded by government to develop a UK "women’s hub".
Although not the same, this proposal does chime with the option of consulting consortiums to provide expertise on specific women’s issues, as outlined in the consultation document. The main distinction is that the "women’s hub" would have more independence from government.
More special treatment and more funding, making it even harder to have the voices of men heard. The question would be if the government did fund such a group and then refused to fund a "men's hub" it really is time to go to law.
Posted by Skimmington
Make no mistake, none of this is about "equality" that is just a SIV they throw at us because their goal is: Matriarchy Matrix. We already live in a Matrix, a feminine preponderant system centered around money, material goods, maternalism, feminization and the collective. But they not only want masculinity permanently destroyed but men smothered out of any influence in any sector of society. Already today we have ladies men cunning foxes like Barack Obama and Joe Biden, who are drones focused on one thing: pleasing women, and lording it over men, in their egotistical self aggrandizing supplication to the animus female psyche. These little dogs never grew up, instead they grew into some kind of fell dark thing that climbed out of hell out from under mommy's dress. They need us to be slaves oppressed at their whims, to dam up their disintegrating weak existence. Because they know that masculinity and men are the only threat to their damned tyranny.
Posted by: CyclotronMajesty | Friday, 11 November 2011 at 05:30
Its the media. It is they who make all this misandry acceptable. The "Women into Journalism" programme a few years ago has provided the smoke screen behind which all this can go on largely unreported. Meanwhile they concentrate on reporting the 'man-crimes'. Basically countinious cover on rapists, peadophiles and domestic violence abusers and soon to be stalkers, if calls for a shiney new anti-stalking law go through.
Posted by: Bob | Monday, 14 November 2011 at 06:22
Thought I'd pop this in.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2064422/Seven-men-happy-woman-family-breadwinner.html
Just because its a rare example of men being asked about these things. It is in fact incredibly rare.
Posted by: Groan | Tuesday, 22 November 2011 at 08:46
hi good looking site good information sharing loving article i like this blog.
Posted by: Surviving Cancer | Tuesday, 09 April 2013 at 14:32