Back in August you may have noticed a huge amount of international coverage and outrage of Virgin Australia's "all men are paedophiles" seating policy. The airline forced a firefigher of all people from his seat simply due to the fact he was guilty of the horrific crime of being male in the vicinity of a child he wasn't related to!
Thanks to Mr Muir sharing his experience and some excellent journalism from the likes of Bridie Jabour, Virgin Australia began a "review". I'm all for carrying out thorough assesments of any possible change in policy, but there's also such things as common sense, basic decency and gender equality, and one would have thought this would have to be the shortest and easiest review any company has ever had to undertake.
Alas this is not the case, and the "all men are paedophiles" policy remains in place whilst Richard Branston and his collegaues assess whether or not you, I and every single man out there present a serious risk to children every time we take a flight. Given the preference for seating chidlren with females, they will also be considering whether all the countless female child absues out there who murder, molest, rape and kidnap chidlren actually exist or not. Alternativley, perhpas Virgin Australia have discovered new evidence that all the Rose Wests, Myra Hindleys and Vanessa Georges of this world all suffer from chronic aerophobia and thus will never set foot on a plane?
I wish Virgin Australia the best of luck with these tricky question which has now taken them almost a quarter of a year. Given the fact that they're clearly struggling with this issue I do have my concerns about their ability to carry out other tasks. If they can't get this call right then I'm doubt they'd be capable of crossing the road, nevermind flying huge metal machines though the sky at hundreds of miles an hour.
Please share your thoughts with Virgin Australia on their blog and whilst they deal with this conundrum I'd advise you to chose an airline that knows their left from right, and right from wrong.
by John Kimble
The insane and dubious Jimmy Savile business seems to be fueled by those who want to declare the same thing as Virgin while making a lot of money?
Meanwhile the other prong of the agenda...:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227976/Female-executives-told-ditch-guilt-putting-kids-childcare-focus-careers.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
but guess who will foot the bill for this...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9654710/Clegg-plans-to-subsidise-nightmare-costs-of-child-care.html
Meanwhile as always Melanie Phillips nails it all on the head...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2224570/Stop-hysteria-Why-state-pay-women-benefits-children.html
of which the result is...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2227930/Millions-lonely-people-The-tragic-legacy-Lefts-war-families.html
Posted by: stuart | Monday, 05 November 2012 at 09:37
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2228123/Work-life-balance-going-plan-Women-aged-24-34-stressed-people-Britain.html
You all wanted "equality" and guess what,through feminism and lies, you made and got inequality towards Men by getting the "easy" card to everything. You haven't even scratched the surface of being an equal to Men yet and already they are whining and moaning, playing victim when times get tough.
Well deserved and trust me, it's gonna get a whole lot worse yet...get me some Popcorn :-)
Posted by: stuart | Monday, 05 November 2012 at 14:25
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2228132/Fire-fighting-fit-Woman-firefighter-33-crowned-world-s-toughest-triumphing-competition-5-000-hopefuls-globe.html
Why call her Worlds toughest "Firefighter" when she did not compete against any men? Isn't it insulting enough that they lowered and dumbed down the entry for firefighters to accommodate unmerited or less merited women in the first place? Same as the military, police you name it.
Posted by: stuart | Monday, 05 November 2012 at 16:09
http://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/tv-and-radio/sharon-osbourne-s-double-mastectomy-raises-questions-about-breast-cancer-treatment-1-2615558
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!
Did someone then throw them into the trash compacter?
What? Isn't it funny that a piece of western feminist meat who laughed on TV about a guy getting his dick cut off now has her tits cut off for cancer.
I think it is marvelous. I hope it haunts her every day and comes back again.
Does the mangina running the site want to delete comments again?
Posted by: stuart | Tuesday, 06 November 2012 at 17:52
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6KFWiidiJo
This is poetry. The guy should not have been sacked. This video is for all femi-nazi scum and self-entitlement western women, this is what is coming for you all. Men have had enough of you and the comments on this video everywhere back it up. Forget the pussy pass twat tv presenter..it is okay to deck women, it is absolutely ok.
just claim you are hormonal, they get away with killing children, so why shouldn't men walk away from defending themselves from scum women with mouths like this.
This made my day, give him a medal.
Posted by: stuart | Tuesday, 06 November 2012 at 21:31
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2229235/Backlash-sexist-Asda-launches-campaign-claiming-great-Christmas-theres-mum.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
Asda has lost my business this Christmas and Tesco not far off with their constant support of the Sexist R4L.
Posted by: stuart | Wednesday, 07 November 2012 at 14:38
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2229237/X-Factor-hopeful-band-booted-horrendous-glass-attack-ex-boyfriend-faces-years-jail.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
watch-out, another pussy pass coming up. Violence against such women in such circumstances, regardless of how severe is PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE! Men need to be re-educated and stop falling into the white knight think-set.
Posted by: stuart | Wednesday, 07 November 2012 at 17:55
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2229302/Pregnant-teenager-18-tried-dodge-train-fare-running-electrified-railway-lines.html
yet another pussy pass today, hits a copper, dodges fair runs on train track...while pregnant. This fine example of mutt meat walks from court.....
How many more times must we see the blatant and outright sexism towards men in our criminal courts? When will something be done about this outrage and disgrace?
Posted by: stuart | Wednesday, 07 November 2012 at 18:10
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9664403/Lady-of-the-manor-wins-8.7m-in-divorce-from-landed-gentry.html
Get paid in the UK for having a Vagina and doing nothing but prancing around at society parties.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9664403/Lady-of-the-manor-wins-8.7m-in-divorce-from-landed-gentry.html
Posted by: stuart | Thursday, 08 November 2012 at 16:50
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9665420/Margaret-Moran-ill-health-means-MP-cannot-be-found-guilty-of-criminal-offence.html
Another pussy pasS!
she can't stand trial because she is "depressed"
Oh how convenient the women use that one.
Posted by: stuart | Thursday, 08 November 2012 at 19:32
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2229862/Charity-worker-Angela-Grays-anger-justice-20-year-old-Jade-Daniels-smashed-brick-face-walks-free-court.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
ANOTHER PUSSY pass and this time even a woman is angry about it, because she is the victim.
Why does our criminal justice system discriminate so grotesqueley against men and keep letting so many women walk?
Posted by: stuart | Thursday, 08 November 2012 at 20:18
Thanks for all the likes for this article everyone. This issue has clearly hit a nerve.
Posted by: John Kimble | Saturday, 10 November 2012 at 04:33
John, i'm the only fecker here....:-)
Have another one!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2230762/John-Lewiss-Christmas-advert-How-TVs-heart-melting-Xmas-ad-Surprising-secrets-years-6million-extravaganza.html
Usual misandrist Christmas message, man must self sacrifice and bring offerings for the useless lazy woman at home as he must make HER happy up on her pedestal...
Posted by: stuart | Saturday, 10 November 2012 at 10:28
It also begs the question "What are people they fear are a danger to children doing on the plane in the first place!!??".
They seems to have closed the comments on their site but I see there are the usual "Stop whinging, its for the kids brigade".
Though they never mention the flipside of the 'its for the kids' argument; the policy should be fought not only for the boys who see what they have to look forward to in adulthood, but also for the girls who see that men are indeed the lowest of the low and its ok to treat them as such.
But of course the fact remains that its actually DISCRIMINATION AGAINST MEN !!
I've noticed amongst some so-called equalitarians (fake equalitarians basically), the "don't discriminate against men because it upsets the kids" argument.
Its a more subtle form of discrimination and frequently seen in headlines. One that springs to mind is the recent "Man shot in Belfast when children were in the area." as though it would have been ok if there had been no children in the 'area'.
This type of misandry is subtle enough to get under the radar of many and should be identified as a feminist tactic, which is exactly what it is.
Posted by: Bob | Saturday, 10 November 2012 at 13:39
Oops slightly disjoint argument in my post there, instead of "don't discriminate against men because it upsets the kids", I should have written "its ok to discriminate agsinst men unless it upsets the kids".
I am a proponent of using the "don't discriminate against men because it upsets the kids" as a secondary argument to back-up the main point that, discrimination is discrimination, period.
Posted by: Bob | Saturday, 10 November 2012 at 13:48
If comments are closed I suggest people express their opinions using the comments section of the Virgin Australia youtube channel. All 8 videos allow unmoderated comments:
http://www.youtube.com/user/virginaustralia/videos?view=0
They also have a Flickr account with comments enabled for all photos.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/virginaustralia/
Finally, it also appears that any Tweets to the company automatically appear on the blog.
Posted by: John Kimble | Saturday, 10 November 2012 at 21:00