Commission for Equality and Human Rights

Government 'Equalities' Office

Members of Parliament

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Sunday, 04 August 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Nice to see Newspapers who frequently assist feminist organisations and support their anti-male drives, also delete comments and accounts to help cover up the truth about female child abusers. Account number 89 deleted now, anything that goes against feminist anti-male propaganda or agenda narrative is always deleted here....even when it is sourced and fact.

Now why would anyone want to help cover up child abuse?




You will notice the comments they allow on this story above, after deleting links to facts and source to show women are the main perpetrators, are ones that clearly express that Men are the perpetrators. (small operation)


The cases are made by the Unions. In the 1970s the unions were male and councils had comparatively small workforces, largely doing practical jobs such as emptying the bins. In labour councils with "closed shops" those unions often got bonuses and other additions negotiated. Twenty years later the workforce had ballooned. Mainly in social care and non teaching jobs in schools . Now a largely female workforce in the unions. Hence the claims coming decades after they could have been made. Unions are now mainly in the state sector and mainly female as a result.


Dorset Echo guilty of deliberately censoring comments in line with feminist agenda and protecting female child predators again....keeping the public ignorant as to the truth about child abuse while allowing comments that clearly uphold the "mostly men do it" narrative.

(post deleted and account deleted screen grab before)

As it is now after censorship:

Now what in that post was offensive other than the truth?

paul parmenter

Very clear proof of sexist bias in the press, Terry; and thereby, making it all the harder to solve the problem of abuse. I also wonder if the goon who offered to act as Hangman would be quite so keen if he realized that the job would entail hanging quite a considerable number of women.


Comments that are off topic just spam the boards, free speech is not about just saying whatever you want, its about allowing everyone to have equal say regarding opinion about a topic, in a courteous and muture manner. Otherwise the board gets a bad reputation and penalised in searches also.

Usually you can tell that you are being trolled by having to repeat the obvious over and over again. Arguing and rearguing obscure points and repeated, even low level, personal attacks are also a sign of trolling.


Paul, skimmington failed to let through the follow up one where i reposted that link to the facts and asked that if they wish to censor my comment again, which contained nothing offensive, could they explain why they are deleting it, they of course censored it and left no explanation

Bob while some may be off topic i ask you, which comment is a hundred time more useful? Mine which makes effort to expose media sexism and deliberate censorship or yours which whines?

Did you go along to the paper and leave a comment or send an email to its editor asking why they censor the truth and protect female paedophiles?

The comments to this entry are closed.


Blog powered by Typepad

Reading List